不同三维辐射应力公式在近岸波生流模拟中的效果评估

周浩洋; 李锐; 宋德海; 陈宇

doi:10.12284/hyxb20260022

不同三维辐射应力公式在近岸波生流模拟中的效果评估

doi: 10.12284/hyxb20260022

周浩洋^{1, 3,},
李锐²,
宋德海^{1, 3, ,},
陈宇^{1, 3}

1.
中国海洋大学物理海洋教育部重点实验室，山东青岛 266100
2.
自然资源部北海预报减灾中心，山东青岛 266061
3.
中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院，山东青岛 266100

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（42476158）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项（202562003）；泰山学者工程专项经费资助（tsqn202211056）。

详细信息

作者简介:
周浩洋（2001—），男，安徽省淮北市人，主要从事浅海动力学研究。E-mail：3wzwhwy@stu.ouc.edu.cn

通讯作者:
宋德海，教授，主要从事近海环流与物质输运研究。E-mail：songdh@ouc.edu.cn

中图分类号: P371.21
计量
- 文章访问数: 128
- HTML全文浏览量: 37
- PDF下载量: 12
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2026-01-10
- 录用日期: 2026-04-29
- 修回日期: 2026-04-14
- 网络出版日期: 2026-05-06
- 刊出日期: 2026-04-30

Performance of different 3D wave radiation stress formulations in modelling nearshore wave-induced current

Zhou Haoyang^{1, 3
,},
Li Rui²,
Song Dehai^{1, 3
, ,},
Chen Yu^{1, 3}

1.
Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography, Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2.
North China Sea Marine Forecasting and Disaster Mitigation Center, Ministry of National Resources, Qingdao 266061, China
3.
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

摘要

摘要: 为准确模拟近岸波生流的变化过程，本文提出了一种垂向分布权重函数的构建方法，据此整合了现有的部分深度依赖型水平辐射应力公式，并推导出一个垂向分布特征可变的水平辐射应力公式。基于浪流耦合数值模式，对不同辐射应力公式的适用性开展对比评估，并选取4组不同条件的水槽实验数据进行验证。结果表明，不同辐射应力公式对波生流结构的模拟效果存在显著差异；本文提出的公式在模拟波浪增减水、有效波高及跨岸流速等方面表现更优，可降低跨岸垂向剖面流速的均方根误差。针对斜坡地形下水平辐射应力公式存在的垂向动量不平衡问题，依托Roseau型地形模型开展动量平衡诊断分析，结果证实，采用本文提出的水平辐射应力公式模拟坡度地形波生流是可行的，其动量平衡特性与考虑垂向分量的三维辐射应力高阶公式基本一致，同时阐释了其他水平辐射应力公式的垂向动量平衡特征，指出部分公式存在明显的动量不平衡缺陷。
- 波浪辐射应力 /
- 波生流 /
- 浪流耦合数值模式 /
- 权重函数 /
- 动量平衡
Abstract: To accurately simulate nearshore wave-induced currents, this study proposes a general construction method for vertical weighting functions. Based on this method, existing depth-dependent horizontal wave radiation stress formulations are unified, and a modified formulation (Z04m) with tunable vertical distribution characteristics is derived. This formulation features a smooth and continuous vertical profile and allows for flexible adaptation to varying wave conditions and sloping topographies by adjusting a single parameter. Using a developed two-way coupled three-dimensional coastal wave-current interaction model, the applicability of different formulations is comprehensively evaluated. The model is validated against four laboratory flume experiments with varying conditions. The results show that the performance of different radiation stress formulations varies considerably in reproducing wave-induced current structures. The modified formulation outperforms the existing ones in simulating wave setup/setdown, significant wave height, and cross-shore vertical velocity profiles, with a significantly reduced root mean square error in cross-shore velocities compared with other formulations. Regarding the potential vertical momentum imbalance associated with using depth-dependent horizontal radiation stress formulations over sloping bottoms, momentum balance diagnostics based on the Roseau-type topography confirm the feasibility of the modified formulation, which includes only horizontal components. Its momentum balance characteristics are comparable to those of higher-order formulations that incorporate vertical components. The vertical momentum balance characteristics of other depth-dependent horizontal radiation stress formulations are also presented, and some are found to be imbalanced.
- wave radiation stress /
- wave-induced current /
- wave-current coupled model /
- weighting function /
- momentum balance

HTML全文

图 1 跨岸标准化辐射应力（S_ii/kE）随相对深度kD和垂向坐标σ的分布

分别以下列公式和条件计算：a. M15、b. M08、c. M21，kH_s = 0.4；d. Z04；e. Z04m，n = 0.2；f. Z04m，n = 5.0；垂向第一个σ层厚度dσ₁取0.05；辐射应力标准化后于不同计算场景下的可比性增强

Fig. 1 Distribution of cross-shore normalized wave radiation stress (S_ii/kE) with respect to the relative depth kD and the vertical coordinate σ

Results calculated by the following formulations and conditions: a. M15, b. M08 and c. M21, kH_s = 0.4; d. Z04; e. Z04m, n = 0.2; f. Z04m, n = 5.0; dσ₁ = 0.05; Standardizing radiation stress improves comparability across different scenarios

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 跨岸标准化的ℑ(σ)（ℑ(σ)/kE）随相对深度kD和垂向坐标σ的分布

计算条件和标准化意义同图1

Fig. 2 Distribution of cross-shore normalized ℑ(σ) (ℑ(σ)/kE) with respect to the relative depth kD and the vertical coordinate σ

The calculation formulations and conditions and the meanings of standardization are the same as in Figure 1

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 TK94实验的地形及有效波高、水位的模拟和实测结果

注意部分绘图线条有重叠

Fig. 3 Simulated and observed results of topography, significant wave height and surface elevation for Experiment TK94

Note that some plot lines overlap in the figure

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 T01实验的地形及有效波高、水位的模拟和实测结果

Fig. 4 Simulated and observed results of topography, significant wave height and surface elevation for Experiment T01

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 RR95实验的地形及有效波高、水位的模拟和实测结果

Fig. 5 Simulated and observed results of topography, significant wave height and surface elevation for Experiment RR95

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 CIEM实验的地形及有效波高、水位的模拟和实测结果

Fig. 6 Simulated and observed results of topography, significant wave height and surface elevation for Experiment CIEM

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 TK94实验模拟所得跨岸流速剖面及实测流速分布

3个离岸较远剖面未使用；注意部分绘图线条有重叠

Fig. 7 Simulated and observed cross-shore velocity profiles for experiment TK94

Three offshore profiles farthest from the shore have not been used; some plot lines overlap in the figures

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 系数Γ的计算方案示意

Fig. 8 The calculation method of the coefficient Γ

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 T01实验模拟所得跨岸流速剖面及实测流速分布

Fig. 9 Simulated and observed cross-shore velocity profiles for Experiment T01

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 RR95实验模拟所得跨岸流速剖面及实测流速分布

Fig. 10 Simulated and observed cross-shore velocity profiles for Experiment RR95

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 CIEM实验模拟所得跨岸流速剖面及实测流速分布

Fig. 11 Simulated and observed cross-shore velocity profiles for experiment CIEM

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 R76实验的地形及有效波高、水位的模拟结果

Fig. 12 Simulations of topography, significant wave height and surface elevation for experiment R76

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 R76实验模拟的标准化净波浪力（a）和减去M15后的标准化净波浪力（b）的垂向分布

Fig. 13 The vertical distribution of normalized net wave force (a) and normalized net wave force (after subtracting M15) (b) simulated in experiment R76

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 模型信息及变量设置

Tab. 1 Numerical experiments setup

变量	TK94	T01	RR95	CIEM
模型跨岸长度x/m	18	29.5	180	50
水平网格间距dx/m	0.2	0.5	2.0	0.5
垂向σ层数kb	41	41	20	41
水深/m	0.4	0.46	4.1	2.65
最大相对深度kD	0.79	1.0	0.87	0.93
地形坡度m	1∶35	1∶35	1∶60 ~ 1∶10	−1∶4 ~ 1∶7
底粗糙度/m	2.5 × 10⁻³	2.5 × 10⁻³	2.0 × 10⁻⁵	2.0 × 10⁻⁴
入射波有效波高H_s0/m	0.127	0.1524	0.96	0.85
入射波周期T₀/s	2.0	2.0	5.0	4.0
入射波波陡s₀	0.020	0.024	0.025	0.034
入射波Iribarren数ξ₀	0.20	0.18	0.11	0.44
破波系数γ或计算方案	S15	S15	0.78	C22
破波生湍系数α	0.4	0.4	0.4	0.4
POM外模时间步长/s	0.005	0.01	0.02	0.00625
POM内外模时间步长比	5	5	5	4
SWAN时间步长/s	0.05	1.0	1.0	1.0
数据交换时间步长/s	0.05	1.0	1.0	1.0
注：深水Iribarren数ξ₀ = m/s₀^0.5为描述波浪破碎类型的无量纲数^[67]。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同辐射应力公式模拟各实验所得剖面流速的决定系数（R²）和均方根误差（RMSE）

Tab. 2 The coefficients of determinations (R²) and the root mean square errors (RMSEs) for cross-shore velocity profiles simulated by different wave radiation stress formulations

实验	R²/RMSE (m·s⁻¹)
实验	M15	M08	M21	Z04	Z04m
TK94	−/0.079	0.527/0.041	0.525/0.041	0.395/0.046	0.558/0.040
T01	−/0.040	0.270/0.010	0.294/0.010	−/0.021	0.501/0.008
RR95	−/0.103	0.278/0.058	0.276/0.059	−/0.072	0.312/0.057
CIEM	−/0.269	0.328/0.165	0.132/0.187	0.346/0.163	0.412/0.154
注：“−”表示R²为负，加粗数字为同比最优。

下载: 导出CSV

A1 不同辐射应力公式模拟的各剖面流速的均方根误差（RMSE）

A1 RMSEs for cross-shore velocity profiles simulated by different wave radiation stress formulations

实验	剖面位置	RMSE（10⁻¹ m·s⁻¹）
实验	剖面位置	M15	M08	M21	Z04	Z04m
TK94	x = 7.275 m	0.700	0.402	0.390	0.301	0.472
	x = 7.885 m	0.811	0.588	0.592	0.307	0.362
	x = 8.495 m	0.948	0.413	0.411	0.659	0.455
	x = 9.110 m	0.725	0.182	0.179	0.492	0.275
	x = 9.725 m	0.720	0.213	0.251	0.525	0.345
T01	d = 13.72 cm	0.361	0.101	0.100	0.188	0.0862
	d = 9.39 cm	0.419	0.101	0.0984	0.212	0.0746
	d = 6.25 cm	0.434	0.0855	0.0836	0.232	0.0782
RR95	x = 65 m	0.300	0.280	0.291	0.277	0.284
	x = 115 m	0.418	0.523	0.522	0.365	0.417
	x = 130 m	0.804	0.479	0.479	0.527	0.424
	x = 138 m	1.45	0.584	0.584	1.04	0.725
	x = 152 m	1.24	0.781	0.782	0.851	0.708
	x = 156 m	1.37	0.738	0.739	0.923	0.706
CIEM	x = 51 m	0.573	0.565	0.543	0.631	0.743
	x = 53 m	1.12	0.758	0.744	0.785	0.693
	x = 54.5 m	2.14	1.09	1.10	1.61	1.16
	x = 55 m	2.69	1.12	1.13	1.92	1.17
	x = 55.5 m	3.94	1.62	1.64	2.09	1.66
	x = 56 m	5.63	3.01	3.02	3.10	3.00
	x = 56.5 m	5.82	3.14	3.03	3.33	2.97
	x = 57 m	3.29	1.08	0.918	1.45	0.938
	x = 58.1 m	1.63	1.51	2.04	0.493	1.49
	x = 59 m	1.99	2.22	2.73	1.59	1.90
	x = 60.2 m	1.95	1.98	2.56	1.62	1.67
	x = 63 m	1.32	0.626	0.777	1.14	0.456
注：加粗数字为同比最优。

下载: 导出CSV

B1 部分变量符号说明

B1 Symbols and abbreviations of some variables

变量符号	说明
ℑ	水平辐射应力公式第二项，可由垂向分布函数构造
Φ	垂向分布函数
F、G	基函数，用于构造垂向分布函数
f、g	基函数F、G的导函数
Γ	M21公式系数，控制式中M08、M15组合比

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(75)

[1]	Xie Mingxiao, Zhang Chi, Yang Zhiwen, et al. Numerical modeling of the undertow structure and sandbar migration in the surfzone[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2017, 31(5): 549−558. doi: 10.1007/s13344-017-0063-9
[2]	Zhang Hua. Transport of microplastics in coastal seas[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2017, 199: 74−86. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2017.09.032
[3]	Lu Jing, Han Guoqi, Song Dehai, et al. The cross-shore component in the vertical structure of wave-induced currents and resulting offshore transport[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2021, 126(10): e2021JC017311.
[4]	Lesser G R, Roelvink J A, van Kester J A T M, et al. Development and validation of a three-dimensional morphological model[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2004, 51(8/9): 883−915.
[5]	Martins K, Bertin X, Mengual B, et al. Wave-induced mean currents and setup over barred and steep sandy beaches[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2022, 179: 102110. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2022.102110
[6]	Andrews D G, McIntyre M E. An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1978, 89(4): 609−646. doi: 10.1017/S0022112078002773
[7]	McWilliams J C, Restrepo J M. The wave-driven ocean circulation[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1999, 29(10): 2523−2540. doi: 10.1175/jpo3099.1
[8]	Uchiyama Y, McWilliams J C, Shchepetkin A F. Wave–current interaction in an oceanic circulation model with a vortex-force formalism: application to the surf zone[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2010, 34(1/2): 16−35. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2010.04.002
[9]	郑金海, 严以新. 波浪辐射应力理论的应用和研究进展[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 1999, 19(6): 5−7. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1006-7647.1999.06.003 Zheng Jinhai, Yan Yixin. Research and application of wave induced radiation stress theory[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 1999, 19(6): 5−7. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1006-7647.1999.06.003
[10]	Dolata L F, Rosenthal W. Wave setup and wave-induced currents in coastal zones[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1984, 89(C2): 1973−1982. doi: 10.1029/JC089iC02p01973
[11]	Péchon P, Teisson C. Numerical modelling of three-dimensional wave-driven currents in the surf-zone[C]//24th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. Kobe: ASCE, 1994: 2503−2512.
[12]	Mellor G. The three-dimensional current and surface wave equations[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2003, 33(9): 1978−1989. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(2003)033<1978:TTCASW>2.0.CO;2
[13]	Mellor G. Some consequences of the three-dimensional current and surface wave equations[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2005, 35(11): 2291−2298. doi: 10.1175/JPO2794.1
[14]	Mellor G L, Donelan M A, Oey L Y. A surface wave model for coupling with numerical ocean circulation models[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2008, 25(10): 1785−1807. doi: 10.1175/2008JTECHO573.1
[15]	Sheng Y P, Liu Tianyi. Three-dimensional simulation of wave-induced circulation: comparison of three radiation stress formulations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2011, 116(C5): C05021. doi: 10.1029/2010jc006765
[16]	Bolaños R, Brown J M, Souza A J. Wave–current interactions in a tide dominated estuary[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2014, 87: 109−123. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2014.05.009
[17]	Marsooli R, Orton P M, Mellor G, et al. A coupled circulation–wave model for numerical simulation of storm tides and waves[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2017, 34(7): 1449−1467. doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0005.1
[18]	Gao Guandong, Wang Xiaohua, Song Dehai, et al. Effects of wave–current interactions on suspended-sediment dynamics during strong wave events in Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao, China[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2018, 48(5): 1053−1078. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-17-0259.1
[19]	Lu Jing, Han Guoqi, Xia Changshui, et al. Sediment dynamics near a sandy spit with wave-induced coastal currents[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2020, 193: 104033. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2019.104033
[20]	Ardhuin F, Jenkins A D, Belibassakis K A. Comments on “The three-dimensional current and surface wave equations”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2008, 38(6): 1340−1350. doi: 10.1175/2007JPO3670.1
[21]	Kumar N, Voulgaris G, Warner J C. Implementation and modification of a three-dimensional radiation stress formulation for surf zone and rip-current applications[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2011, 58(12): 1097−1117. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2011.06.009
[22]	Bennis A C, Ardhuin F. Comments on “The depth-dependent current and wave interaction equations: a revision”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2011, 41(10): 2008−2012. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-11-055.1
[23]	Mellor G. Reply[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2011, 41(10): 2013−2015. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-11-071.1
[24]	Mellor G. Waves, circulation and vertical dependence[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2013, 63(4): 447−457. doi: 10.1007/s10236-013-0601-9
[25]	Mellor G. A combined derivation of the integrated and vertically resolved, coupled wave–current equations[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2015, 45(6): 1453−1463. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-14-0112.1
[26]	Mellor G. On surf zone fluid dynamics[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2021, 51(1): 37−46.
[27]	Ardhuin F, Suzuki N, McWilliams J C, et al. Comments on “a combined derivation of the integrated and vertically resolved, coupled wave–current equations”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2017, 47(9): 2377−2385. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-17-0065.1
[28]	Wu Yuefeng, Zhang Qinghe, Wu Yongsheng, et al. Comments on “on surf zone fluid dynamics”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2022, 52(4): 775−783.
[29]	Xia Huayong, Xia Zongwan, Zhu Liangsheng. Vertical variation in radiation stress and wave-induced current[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2004, 51(4): 309−321. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.03.003
[30]	Zhang Dan. Numerical simulation of large-scale wave and currents[D]. Singapore: National University of Singapore, 2004.
[31]	Lin P Z, Zhang D. The depth-dependent radiation stresses and their effect on coastal currents[C]//Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Hydrodynamics: Hydrodynamics VI Theory and Applications. Perth, 2004: 247−253.
[32]	Wu Xiangzhong, Zhang Qinghe. A three-dimensional nearshore hydrodynamic model with depth-dependent radiation stresses[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2009, 23(2): 291−302.
[33]	Xie Mingxiao. Establishment, validation and discussions of a three dimensional wave-induced current model[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2011, 38(3/4): 230−243.
[34]	Xie Mingxiao, Li Shan, Zhang Chi, et al. Investigation and discussion on the beach morphodynamic response under storm events based on a three-dimensional numerical model[J]. China Ocean Engineering, 2021, 35(1): 12−25. doi: 10.1007/s13344-021-0002-7
[35]	Ji Chao, Zhang Qinghe, Wu Yongsheng. Derivation of three-dimensional radiation stress based on Lagrangian solutions of progressive waves[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2017, 47(11): 2829−2842. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-16-0277.1
[36]	Chen Tongqing, Zhang Qinghe, Wu Yongsheng, et al. Development of a wave-current model through coupling of FVCOM and SWAN[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2018, 164: 443−454. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.06.062
[37]	纪超. 波流耦合作用下三维泥沙输运和岸滩演变的数值模拟[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2019. Ji Chao. 3D numerical modelling of sediment transport and morphological evolution due to coupled wave-current[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2019.
[38]	Ji Chao, Zhang Qinghe, Wu Yongsheng. A comparison study of three-dimensional radiation stress formulations[J]. Coastal Engineering Journal, 2019, 61(2): 224−240. doi: 10.1080/21664250.2019.1582579
[39]	纪超, 张庆河, 马殿光, 等. 基于新型三维辐射应力的近岸波流耦合模型[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2022, 56(1): 128−136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2022.01.014 Ji Chao, Zhang Qinghe, Ma Dianguang, et al. Nearshore coupled wave-current model based on new three-dimensional radiation stress formulation[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2022, 56(1): 128−136. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2022.01.014
[40]	季则舟, 任腾飞, 张金凤, 等. 三维水沙模型在航道减淤措施中的应用[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2024(5): 1−9. Ji Zezhou, Ren Tengfei, Zhang Jinfeng, et al. Application of three-dimensional hydro-sediment models in navigation channel siltation reduction measures[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering, 2024(5): 1−9.
[41]	郑金海, 严以新. 波浪辐射应力张量的垂向变化[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2001, 16(2): 246−253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4874.2001.02.016 Zheng Jinhai, Yan Yixin. Vertical variations of wave-induced radiation stresses tensor[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2001, 16(2): 246−253. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4874.2001.02.016
[42]	吴相忠. 考虑垂向三维辐射应力的三维水流模型[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2006. Wu Xiangzhong. 3D hydrodynamic model with the depth-dependent radiation stresses[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2006.
[43]	吴相忠, 张庆河. 基于二阶斯托克斯波理论的辐射应力垂向分布[J]. 海洋科学, 2012, 36(8): 64−69. Wu Xiangzhong, Zhang Qinghe. Vertical distribution of radiation stresses based on the second-order stokes wave theory[J]. Marine Sciences, 2012, 36(8): 64−69.
[44]	张振伟. 波生流垂向分布规律和模拟[D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2013. Zhang Zhenwei. Feature of the vertical distribution of wave induced currents with experimental and numerical simulations[D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2013.
[45]	李锐. 近岸浪−流耦合物理机制及其应用研究[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2013. Li Rui. On the physical mechanisms of wave-current coupling in nearshore zone and their applications[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2013.
[46]	解鸣晓, 张玮. 近岸波生流运动三维数值模拟及验证[J]. 水科学进展, 2011, 22(3): 391−399. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2011.03.009 Xie Mingxiao, Zhang Wei. 3D numerical modeling of nearshore wave-induced currents[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2011, 22(3): 391−399. doi: 10.14042/j.cnki.32.1309.2011.03.009
[47]	解鸣晓, 李姗, 张弛, 等. 沙质海岸破波带内底部离岸流及沙坝迁移数值模拟研究[J]. 水道港口, 2016, 37(4): 349−355. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8443.2016.04.008 Xie Mingxiao, Li Shan, Zhang Chi, et al. Numerical modeling of the undertow and sandbar migration process in the surfzone[J]. Journal of Waterway and Harbor, 2016, 37(4): 349−355. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8443.2016.04.008
[48]	刘磊, 费建芳, 章立标, 等. 台风条件下一种新的浪流相互作用参数化方法在耦合模式中的应用[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(5): 059201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.059201 Liu Lei, Fei Jianfang, Zhang Libiao, et al. New parameterization of wave-current interaction used in a two-way coupled model under typhoon conditions[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(5): 059201. doi: 10.7498/aps.61.059201
[49]	王平, 张宁川. 近岸波生环流的三维数值模拟研究[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2015, 36(1): 34−40. Wang Ping, Zhang Ningchuan. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of the wave-induced nearshore circulation[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2015, 36(1): 34−40.
[50]	Longuet-Higgins M S, Stewart R W. Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications[J]. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 1964, 11(4): 529−562. doi: 10.1016/0011-7471(64)90001-4
[51]	Ursell F. The long-wave paradox in the theory of gravity waves[J]. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1953, 49(4): 685−694. doi: 10.1017/S0305004100028887
[52]	Putrevu U, Svendsen I A. Three-dimensional dispersion of momentum in wave-induced nearshore currents[J]. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 1999, 18(3): 409−427. doi: 10.1016/S0997-7546(99)80038-7
[53]	张弛, 王义刚, 郑金海. 波生流垂向结构研究综述[J]. 水科学进展, 2009, 20(5): 739−746. Zhang Chi, Wang Yigang, Zheng Jinhai. Review of the vertical structure of wave-induced currents[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009, 20(5): 739−746.
[54]	Hughes C J, Liu Guoqiang, Perrie W, et al. Impact of Langmuir turbulence, wave breaking, and stokes drift on upper ocean dynamics under hurricane conditions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2021, 126(10): e2021JC017388. doi: 10.1029/2021JC017388
[55]	Mellor G L, Yamada T. Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 1982, 20(4): 851−875. doi: 10.1029/RG020i004p00851
[56]	Warner J C, Sherwood C R, Arango H G, et al. Performance of four turbulence closure models implemented using a generic length scale method[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2005, 8(1/2): 81−113. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2003.12.003
[57]	Rascle N, Chapron B, Ardhuin F, et al. A note on the direct injection of turbulence by breaking waves[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2013, 70: 145−151. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.09.001
[58]	Feddersen F, Trowbridge J H. The effect of wave breaking on surf-zone turbulence and alongshore currents: a modeling study[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2005, 35(11): 2187−2203. doi: 10.1175/JPO2800.1
[59]	吴岳峰, 张庆河, 纪超. 波增紊动量化及其在三维近岸流模型中的应用[J/OL]. 海洋工程, (2025−05−15)[2026−04−01]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1423.P.20250515.1521.006. Wu Yuefeng, Zhang Qinghe, Ji Chao. Quantification of wave-enhanced turbulence and its application in a three-dimensional nearshore circulation model[J/OL]. The Ocean Engineering, (2025-05-15)[2026-04-01]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/32.1423.P.20250515.1521.006.
[60]	SWAN Team. SWAN scientific and technical documentation, SWAN Cycle III Version 41.51A[Z]. Delft University of Technology, 2024.
[61]	SWAN Team. SWAN user manual, SWAN cycle III version 41.51[Z]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2024: 146.
[62]	Kirby J T, Chen T M. Surface waves on vertically sheared flows: approximate dispersion relations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1989, 94(C1): 1013−1027. doi: 10.1029/JC094iC01p01013
[63]	Elias E P L, Gelfenbaum G, Van der Westhuysen A J. Validation of a coupled wave-flow model in a high-energy setting: the mouth of the Columbia River[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2012, 117(C9): C09011.
[64]	Ellingsen S Å, Li Y. Approximate dispersion relations for waves on arbitrary shear flows[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2017, 122(12): 9889−9905. doi: 10.1002/2017JC012994
[65]	Ting F C K, Kirby J T. Observation of undertow and turbulence in a laboratory surf zone[J]. Coastal Engineering, 1994, 24(1/2): 51−80. doi: 10.1016/0378-3839(94)90026-4
[66]	Salmon J E, Holthuijsen L H, Zijlema M, et al. Scaling depth-induced wave-breaking in two-dimensional spectral wave models[J]. Ocean Modelling, 2015, 87: 30−47. doi: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2014.12.011
[67]	Battjes J A. Surf similarity[C]//14th International Conference on Coastal Engineering. Copenhagen: ASCE, 1974: 466-480.
[68]	Ting F C K. Laboratory study of wave and turbulence velocities in a broad-banded irregular wave surf zone[J]. Coastal Engineering, 2001, 43(3/4): 183−208. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3839(01)00013-8
[69]	Roelvink J A, Reniers A. LIP 11D Delta Flume Experiments: A Dataset for Profile Model Validation[Z]. WL/Delft Hydraulics, 1995.
[70]	van Der A D A, van der Zanden J, O’Donoghue T, et al. Large-scale laboratory study of breaking wave hydrodynamics over a fixed bar[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2017, 122(4): 3287−3310. doi: 10.1002/2016JC012072
[71]	Chen Zereng, Zhang Qinghe, Wu Yongsheng, et al. A modified breaker index formula for depth-induced wave breaking in spectral wave models[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 264: 112527. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112527
[72]	Smith E R, Kraus N C. Laboratory study of wave-breaking over bars and artificial reefs[J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 1991, 117(4): 307−325. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(1991)117:4(307)
[73]	Mellor G. Reply to “comments on ‘a combined derivation of the integrated and vertically resolved, coupled wave–current equations’”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2017, 47(9): 2387−2389. doi: 10.1175/JPO-D-17-0096.1
[74]	Mellor G. Reply to “comments on ‘on surf zone fluid dynamics’”[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 2022, 52(4): 785−786.
[75]	Roseau M. Asymptotic Wave Theory[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1976.