Simulation analysis of the detection effect of navigation marine direct current resistivity to seabed macro seepage and a system's design
-
摘要: 为实现海底宏渗漏气体连续调查,提出了一种走航式海洋电阻率探测技术。根据前人原位观测资料和含气水体电阻率特征构建地电模型;采用数值模拟和室内试验方法获得不同参数电阻率映像剖面,分析确定探测剖面异常特征,评价探测效果。在此基础上进一步进行了探测系统设计和实验测试。研究结果表明,走航式海洋电法探测电缆可由2个供电电流极和8个电位测量极组成,电位极距需小于0.05 m;测量可采用偶极装置通过并行采集方式实现。气体分布区表现为高阻异常,异常模式由走航速度、排列长度和气体分布区横向宽度共同决定,可分为7种情形;探测电阻率极大值和气体喷出流速存在正相关指数关系。该技术可实现气体分布范围和喷出速率快速探测。Abstract: To achieve continuous survey of seabed macro seepage, the application of a navigation marine direct current resistivity survey method is initiated in this paper. To guarantee the feasibility of the proposed method, geoelectric models have been built based on the existing in-situ observation and resistivity characteristics of gas-bearing water. In this case, resistivity sections imagine with different design parameters are obtained by numerical simulation and laboratory tests; the anomaly characteristics of resistivity sections are analyzed and the detection effect of the method is evaluated. And on this basis, the design of detection system design and experimental test are further carried out. The study results indicate that the cable of navigation 2D electrical imaging system could be composed of 2 current electrodes and 8 voltage electrodes, and the spacing between electrodes must be less than 0.05 m; then measurement can be achieved by means of parallel acquisition of dipole-dipole array. Gas distribution area shows obvious high-resistivity anomaly. The pattern of this anomaly can be categorized into 7 types, which were jointly determined by the factors of travel speed, the length of the arrangement and the lateral width of the gas distribution area. There is a positive exponential relation between the maximum value of resistivity can be detected and the rate of gas eruption. Conclusively, the navigation 2D electrical imaging method is an demonstrated method which could effectively detect the range of gas distribution and the rate of gas eruption in a quick manner.
-
Washburn L, Johnson C, Gotschalk C C, et al. A gas-capture buoy for measuring bubbling gas flux in oceans and lakes[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2001, 18(8):1411-1420. Leifer I, Boles J. Measurement of marine hydrocarbon seep flow through fractured rock and unconsolidated sediment[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2005, 22(4):551-568. Takahashi H, Asakawa E, Hayashi T, et al. Development of ocean bottom multi-component seismic system for methane hydrate dissociation monitoring[C]. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference. Houston, Texas, USA:Offshore Technology Conference, 2011. 邸鹏飞, 冯东, 高立宝, 等. 海底冷泉流体渗漏的原位观测技术及冷泉活动特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2008, 23(5):1592-1602. Di Pengfei, Feng Dong, Gao Libao, et al. In situ measurement of fluid flow and signatures of seep activity at marine seep sites[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2008, 23(5):1592-1602. 龙建军, 黄为, 邹大鹏, 等. 海底天然气渗漏流量声学测量方法及初步实验研究[J]. 热带海洋学报, 2012, 31(5):100-105. Long Jianjun, Huang Wei, Zou Dapeng, et al. Method of measuring bubble flow from cool seeps on seafloor using acoustic transmission and preliminary experiments[J]. Journal of Tropical Oceanography, 2012, 31(5):100-105. 刘润华, 邹大鹏, 龙建军, 等. 超声多普勒测量海底渗漏气泡流速的实验研究[J]. 海洋技术学报, 2016, 35(2):46-50. Liu Runhua, Zou Dapeng, Long Jianjun, et al. Experimental study on ultrasonic Doppler measurement of the velocity of seafloor leakage bubbles[J]. Journal of Ocean Technology, 2016, 35(2):46-50. Nikolovska A, Sahling H, Bohrmann G. Hydroacoustic methodology for detection, localization, and quantification of gas bubbles rising from the seafloor at gas seeps from the eastern Black Sea[J]. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 2008, 9(10):Q10010. Von Deimling J S. Gas leakage and seepage detection using multibeam mapping sonar[C]. Proceedings of the HYDRO International. Denver, Colorado, USA, 2010. Lagabrielle R. The effect of water on direct current resistivity measurement from the sea, river or lake floor[J]. Geoexploration, 1983, 21(2):165-170. Loke M H, Barker R D. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1996, 44(1):131-152. Goto T N, Kasaya T, Machiyama H, et al. A marine deep-towed DC resistivity survey in a methane hydrate area, Japan Sea[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2008, 39(1):52-59. Telford W M, Geldart L P, Sheriff R E. 应用地球物理[M]. 陈石, 孙少波, 高志亮, 等译. 北京:科学出版社, 2011. Telford W M, Geldart L P, Sheriff R E. Applied geophysics[M]. Chen Shi, Sun Shaobo, Gao Zhiliang, et al, trans. Beijing:Science Press, 2011. Naudts L, Greinert J, Poort J, et al. Active venting sites on the gas-hydrate-bearing Hikurangi Margin, off New Zealand:Diffusive-versus bubble-released methane[J]. Marine Geology, 2010, 272(1/4):233-250. Sauter E J, Muyakshin S I, Charlou J L, et al. Methane discharge from a deep-sea submarine mud volcano into the upper water column by gas hydrate-coated methane bubbles[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2006, 243(3/4):354-365. Leifer I, Patro R K, Bowyer P. A study on the temperature variation of rise velocity for large clean bubbles[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2010, 17(10):1392-1402.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 407
- HTML全文浏览量: 3
- PDF下载量: 166
- 被引次数: 0