北极海冰密集度数值预报及验证评估研究

李明; 杨清华; 赵杰臣; 孙晓宇; 田忠翔; 沈辉; 郝光华; 李春花; 张林

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.11.005

北极海冰密集度数值预报及验证评估研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2018.11.005

1.
中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院, 山东青岛 266100;国家海洋环境预报中心, 北京 100081
2.
中山大学大气科学学院广东省气候变化与自然灾害研究重点实验室, 广东珠海 519082
3.
国家海洋环境预报中心, 北京 100081

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划课题（2018YFC1407205）；国家自然科学基金项目（41376188）

计量
- 文章访问数: 727
- HTML全文浏览量: 6
- PDF下载量: 248
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-01-19
- 修回日期: 2018-05-17

Arctic sea ice concentration numerical forecasting and its evaluation

1.
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmosphere Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
3.
National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, Beijing 100081, China

摘要

摘要: 本文系统地评估了国家海洋环境预报中心于我国第七次北极科学考察期间开展的北极海冰密集度数值预报结果。该预报系统基于麻省理工大学通用环流模式，并采用牛顿松弛逼近（Nudging）资料同化方法，计算输出未来1~5 d的北极海冰密集度预报产品。本文将数值预报结果同卫星观测的海冰密集度、再分析资料和"雪龙"号第七次北极考察期间观测的海冰密集度数据进行了对比分析。结果表明，预报的北极海冰密集度小于卫星观测值，24 h、72 h和120 h预报结果的偏差分别为-2.7%、-3.1%和-3.2%；数值产品的预报技巧好于气候态结果和惯性预报，但是在海冰出现快速融化或冻结时，基于Nudging同化的数值预报技巧仍有不足。另外，相比船测数据，数值预报结果在海冰边缘区的偏差相对较大，24 h、72 h和120 h预报结果的偏差分别为8.8%、12.0%和14.5%。
- 海冰密集度 /
- 预报 /
- 北极 /
- 评估
Abstract: In this study, we evaluated the 24-120 h Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts provided by National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center during the 7th Chinese National Arctic Research Expedition (CHINARE 2016). The Arctic sea ice forecast system was based on the MIT general circulation model (MITgcm) ice-ocean coupled model with Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer 2 (AMSR2) sea ice concentration data Nudged. We compared the numerical forecast products with the satellite data, reanalysis data and ship-based in situ sea ice concentration observations during CHINARE 2016. It was shown that the Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts were smaller than the satellite data. The mean biases between 24 h, 72 h, 120 h forecasts and satellite data were -2.7%, -3.1% and -3.2%. The numerical sea ice concentration forecasts were better than the climatological means and the inertial forecasts. But the forecast skill was required to improve when the Arctic sea ice had surged rapid melting or freezing. Moreover, the forecast biases were larger compared with ship in situ observations in the marginal ice zone. The mean biases between 24 h, 72 h, 120 h forecasts and ship in situ data were 8.8%, 12.0% and 14.5%.
- sea ice concentration /
- forecast /
- Arctic /
- evaluation

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

IPCC. Climate change 2014:Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B:Regional aspects[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Comiso J C, Parkinson C L, Gersten R, et al. Accelerated decline in the Arctic sea ice cover[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2008, 35:L01703.

Parkinson C L, Cavalieri D J, Gloersen P, et al. Arctic sea ice extents, areas, and trends, 1978-1996[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 1999, 104(C9):20837-20856.

Rothrock D A, Yu Y, Maykut G A. Thinning of the Arctic sea-ice cover[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1999, 26(23):3469-3472.

Lindsay R, Schweiger A. Arctic sea ice thickness loss determined using subsurface, aircraft, and satellite observations[J]. The Cryosphere, 2015, 9(1):269-283.

Posey P G, Metzger E J, Wallcraft A J, et al. Improving Arctic sea ice edge forecasts by assimilating high horizontal resolution sea ice concentration data into the US Navy's ice forecast systems[J]. The Cryosphere, 2015, 9(4):1735-1745.

Smith G C, Roy F, Reszka M, et al. Sea ice forecast verification in the Canadian Global Ice Ocean Prediction System[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2016, 142(695):659-671.

Sakov P, Counillon F, Bertino L, et al. TOPAZ4:an ocean-sea ice data assimilation system for the North Atlantic and Arctic[J]. Ocean Science, 2012, 8(4):633-656.

杨清华, 刘骥平, 张占海, 等. 北极海冰数值预报的初步研究——基于海冰-海洋耦合模式MITgcm的模拟试验[J]. 大气科学, 2011, 35(3):473-482. Yang Qinghua, Liu Jiping, Zhang Zhanhai, et al. A preliminary study of the Arctic sea ice numerical forecasting:coupled sea ice-ocean modelling experiments based on MITgcm[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2011, 35(3):473-482.

杨清华, 李春花, 邢建勇, 等. 2010年夏季北极海冰数值预报试验[J]. 极地研究, 2012, 24(1):87-94. Yang Qinghua, Li Chunhua, Xing Jianyong, et al. Arctic sea ice forecasting experiments in the summer of 2010[J]. Chinese Journal of Polar Research, 2012, 24(1):87-94.

Yang Qinghua, Liu Jiping, Zhang Zhanhai, et al. Sensitivity of the Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts to different atmospheric forcing:a case study[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2014, 33(12):15-23.

赵杰臣, 杨清华, 李明, 等. Nudging资料同化对北极海冰密集度预报的改进[J]. 海洋学报, 2016, 38(5):70-82. Zhao Jiechen, Yang Qinghua, Li Ming, et al. Improving Arctic sea ice concentration forecasts with a Nudging data assimilation method[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2016, 38(5):70-82.

Zhang J L, Hibler W D Ⅲ. On an efficient numerical method for modeling sea ice dynamics[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 1997, 102(C4):8691-8702.

Zhang J, Hibler W D Ⅲ, Steele M, et al. Arctic ice-ocean modeling with and without climate restoring[J]. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 1998, 28(2):191-217.

Spreen G, Kaleschke L, Heygster G. Sea ice remote sensing using AMSR-E 89-GHz channels[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2008, 113(C2):C02S03.

Dee D P, Uppala S M, Simmons A J, et al. The ERA-Interim reanalysis:configuration and performance of the data assimilation system[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2011, 137(656):553-597.

Worby A, Allison I, Dirita V. Technique for making ship-based observations of Antarctic sea ice thickness and characteristics[R]. Research Report No. 14. Hobart:Australia Antarctic Division, 1999.

Hebert D A, Allard R A, Metzger E J, et al. Short-term sea ice forecasting:an assessment of ice concentration and ice drift forecasts using the U.S. Navy's Arctic Cap Nowcast/Forecast System[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2015, 120(12):8327-8345.

van Woert M L, Zou Chengzhi, Meier W N, et al. Forecast verification of the Polar Ice Prediction System (PIPS) sea ice concentration fields[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2004, 21(6):944-957.

Yang Qinghua, Losa S N, Losch M, et al. Assimilating SMOS sea ice thickness into a coupled ice-ocean model using a local SEIK filter[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Oceans, 2014, 119(10):6680-6692.

Yang Qinghua, Losa S N, Losch M, et al. The role of atmospheric uncertainty in Arctic summer sea ice data assimilation and prediction[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2015, 141(691):2314-2323.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计