悬浮泥沙在长江口铀非保守行为中的重要作用

周婧; 杜金洲; 毕倩倩; 王锦龙; 刘丹彤

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2016.12.005

悬浮泥沙在长江口铀非保守行为中的重要作用

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2016.12.005

华东师范大学河口海岸学国家重点实验室, 上海 200062

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（41240038，41376089）。

计量
- 文章访问数: 665
- HTML全文浏览量: 25
- PDF下载量: 760
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-06-14

The importance of the suspended sediment for the uranium non-conservative behavior in the Changjiang Estuary

State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China

摘要

摘要: 利用高精度的电感耦合等离子体质谱仪对2014年1月长江口表层水中溶解铀浓度及其²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值、2013年3月长江口表层沉积物中各矿物组分的铀含量及其²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值进行了测定，研究了其空间分布特征和影响因素。结果表明：除了长江径流和海水之外，长江口还有其他的溶解铀来源。水体中过剩铀与悬浮颗粒物浓度呈现显著相关性（r²=0.96）。对长江口表层沉积物进行的序列提取实验进一步表明，水体中悬浮颗粒物或沉积物中可解吸态和碳酸钙结合态铀可以在河口区域释放进入水体，而铁锰氧化物和有机物结合铀比较稳定，不受河口区混合过程的影响。每千克颗粒物或沉积物能够释放约2 μmol颗粒态铀，使其转化为溶解态。然而，铁氢氧化物和细颗粒物的絮凝吸附作用也可使溶解铀同时从河口水体中清除。在低盐度区，铀的清除和添加过程速率相近，使溶解铀呈现暂时的"伪保守"现象：颗粒态释放的铀具有明显低的²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值，导致水体的²³⁴U/²³⁸U低于保守混合值。在中高盐度区域，溶解铀呈现明显的富集现象。但是由于水相和颗粒相中的铀交换，可释放颗粒态铀的²³⁴U/²³⁸U接近溶解铀的²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值，从而导致水体的²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值呈现出保守性。长江口颗粒物的铀释放通量为（3.48±0.41）×10⁵ mol/a，约占输入的总颗粒态铀通量（1.80±0.17）×10⁶ mol/a的19.3%。长江口输入东海的溶解铀总通量（河流溶解态铀与河口添加铀之和）为（2.68±0.13）×10⁶ mol/a，约为世界河流入海铀通量的11.7%。
- 溶解铀 /
- 颗粒态铀 /
- ²³⁴U/²³⁸U比值 /
- 非保守 /
- 长江口
Abstract: To study geochemical behavior of uranium in the Changjiang Estuary (CJE), surface water and surface sediment samples were collected along a salinity gradient during January 2014 and March 2013, respectively. The dissolved uranium concentration (DUC) and ²³⁴U/²³⁸U activity ratio (AR) were measured by the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). Sequential extraction experiments of surface sediments (collected from the freshwater end-member to the seaward boundary of the sandbar) were also conducted to analyze spatial distribution of U components and ²³⁴U/²³⁸U ARs in four fractions:desorption, calcium carbonate, Fe-Mn oxide and organic matter. The results showed that there is an extra source of the dissolved uranium into the CJE by other processes excepting U supplied from the ideal mixing process of river water and seawater. The excess DUC and suspended particle matter (SPM) showed a strong positive correlation (r²=0.96). Around 2 μmol U can be transferred from per kilogram particulate into aqueous phase through the desorption and calcium carbonate dissolution, but this phenomenon did not occur for the Fe-Mn oxides and particulate organic matter. At the low salinity region, the releasable particulate U with low ²³⁴U/²³⁸U ARs resulted in the measured ²³⁴U/²³⁸U ARs of the water column below the conservative mixing curve, although the DUC points fell on the conservative mixing line. However, flocculations of the iron hydroxide and fine particle may cause simultaneous depletion of the dissolved uranium. Consequently, when the U input and removal rates were approximately equal at the low salinity region, the dissolved uranium showed apparently conservative phenomenon. At the mid-high salinity region (with high SPM), excess dissolved uranium was observed in the water column, but the U exchange between the particulate and aqueous phases led to that the releasable ²³⁴U/²³⁸U ARs of the particles were close to the measured ²³⁴U/²³⁸U ARs in the water column.The excess dissolved uranium flux from the particle was estimated as (3.48±0.41)×10⁵ mol/a which occupied 19.3% particlulate U flux[(1.80±0.17)×10⁶ mol/a] into the CJE. The total flux (i.e., riverine flux plus additional flux) of the dissolved uranium from the CJE[about (2.68±0.13)×10⁶ mol/a] contributed about 11.7% of the DU input to the world ocean.
- dissolved uranium /
- particulate uranium /
- ²³⁴U/²³⁸U AR /
- non-conservation /
- Changjiang Estuary

HTML全文

参考文献(19)

Henderson G M, Anderson R F. The U-series toolbox for paleoceanography[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2003, 52(1):493-531, doi: 10.2113/0520493.

Cochran J K, Barnes C, Achman D, et al. Thorium -234/Uranium -238 disequilibrium as an indicator of scavenging rates and participate organic carbon fluxes in the Northeast Water Polynya, Greenland[J]. Journal of geophysical research, 1995, 100(C3):4399-4410.

Henderson G M. Seawater (²³⁴U/²³⁸U) during the last 800 thousand years[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 199(1/2):97-110.

Dunk R, Mills R, Jenkins W. A reevaluation of the oceanic uranium budget for the Holocene[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002, 190(1/4):45-67.

McKee B A. Chapter 6 U-and Th-Series nuclides in estuarine environments[J]. Radioactivity in the Environment, 2008, 13:193-225.

McKee B A, DeMaster D J, Nittrouer C A. Uranium geochemistry on the Amazon Shelf:Evidence for uranium release from bottom sediments[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1987, 51(10):2779-2786.

Carroll J, Moore W S. Uranium removal during low discharge in the Ganges-Brahmaputra mixing zone[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1993, 57(21/22):4987-4995.

Chabaux F, Riotte J, Deauincev O. U-Th-Ra fractionation during weathering and river transport[J]. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 2003, 52(1):533-576.

Chabaux F, Riotte J, Clauer N, et al. Isotopic tracing of the dissolved U fluxes of Himalayan Rivers:Implications for present and past U budgets of the Ganges-Brahmaputra system[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2001, 65(19):3201-3217.

Church T M, Sarin M M, Fleisher M Q, et al. Salt marshes:An important coastal sink for dissolved uranium[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1996, 60(20):3879-3887.

Swarzenski P W, Campbell P, Porcelli D, et al. The estuarine chemistry and isotope systematics of ²³⁴,²³⁸U in the Amazon and Fly Rivers[J]. Continental Shelf Research, 2004, 24(19):2357-2372.

Zhou Jing, Du Jinzhou, Moore W S, et al. Concentrations and fluxes of uranium in two major Chinese rivers:The Changjiang River and the Huanghe River[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2015, 152:56-64.

沈焕庭, 贺松林, 潘定安, 等. 长江河口最大浑浊带研究[J]. 地理学报, 1992, 47(5):472-479. Shen Huanting, He Songlin, Pan Ding'an, et al.A study of turbidity maximum in the Changjiang Estuary[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1992, 47(5):472-479.

陈沈良, 胡方西, 胡辉, 等. 长江口区河海划界自然条件及方案探讨[J]. 海洋学研究, 2009, 27(S1):1-9. Chen Shenliang, Hu Fangxi, Hu Hui, et al. On the natural conditions and program for river-sea delimitation in Changjiang River Estuary[J]. Journal of Marine Sciences, 2009, 27(S1):1-9.

Wu Hui, Zhu Jianrong, Chen Bingrui, et al. Quantitative relationship of runoff and tide to saltwater spilling over from the North Branch in the Changjiang Estuary:a numerical study[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2006, 69(1/2):125-132.

Li Chao, Yang Shouye, Zhang Weiguo. Magnetic properties of sediments from major rivers, aeolian dust, loess soil and desert in China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2012, 45:190-200.

Tes穳敩?潲渠?琬栠敃?獭灰慢瑥楬慬氠?瘠慇爠楃愬琠楂潩湳獳?潮映?栮攠慓癥祱?浥敮瑴慩污獬?慥湸摴?潡牣杴慩湯楮挠?捲慯牣扥潤湵?楥渠?瑯桲攠??慥猠瑳??档楩湡慴?卯敮愠?捦漠湰瑡楲湴敩湣瑵慬污?獥栠整汲晡?獥攠摭楥浴敡湬瑳獛孊?崮???桡敬浹楴捩慣污??敃潨汥潭杩祳?????㈱????㈠?㈱?????????????扢牲?孛㈱?嵝?婋桯慭椦?圲攲椵搻潲湥杫???愠楃??楡湳桴慮渦?′?申漻?塖椬愠湅杴桴畬楥???愬爠扥潴渠慡瑬攮?獅祶獡瑬敵浡?慩湯摮??佦?獥畸扴????獩畯扮??摩敧来慳獴獩楯湮朠?晥汣畨确敩獱?楥湳?瑵桳敥?椠湴湯攠牤?整獥瑲畭慩牮祥?潬晥??栠慩湳杯橴楯慰湩杣??奯慭湰杯瑳穩整??剮椠癩敮爠???桥楳湴愠孳?嵩???慊牝椮渠敁??桬敹浴楩獣瑡牬礠????あ????ち???????㈠??????摴潲楹?ㄠ???????樸?洨愶爩挺栱攱洰?木?????监?ひ????扝爠?孨??崠??慈測朠??潷湡杲祤畳攠??婌栬愠湗条?塳楥慲潢硵楲慧??匠畊渮??楳湵?￣攲琳?愼氯???椾癕攬爠猼楳瑵祰￣愲渳搴?猯灳慵瑰椾慕氠?摮楤猠琼牳極扰甾琲椳漲渼?潳晵?猾敔摨椠浩敮渠瑳?慡海浡潴湥楲慛?潝砮椠摅楡穲楴湨朠?据牤攠湐慬牡据桥慴敡潲瑹愠?楣湩?牮散獥瀠潌湥獴整?瑲潳?攠猱琹甸愶爬椠游攰?愳港搴?攺渲瘴椱爭漲渵洱攮渼瑢慲氾?朲爰慝搠楔敯湯瑬獥?楊測?瑂桡數??桲愠湍朠橓椬愠湔杨??獳瑯畮愠牊礮?慔湨摥??慥獨瑡??桯楲渠慯?匠敵慲孡?嵩???楩捳牯潴扯楰潥汳漠杷祩??㈠びち????????と?????????扨牲?孥?さ崮?卋愮爠楥湳???????桛畊牝挮栠?味?????敮桥愬瘠楃潯畡牳?潡晬?畡牮慤渠楓畨浥?摦甠牓楣湩来?浣楥砬椠渱朹?椷測?琲栵攨″?攺氲愸眳愭爲改?愮渼摢??桛攲猱慝瀠旲懋殺攬??獹琬甠憈牙椱攮猠孿?嵥???獩瑣甎愗爯槤滯日???潛慊獝琮愠汿?愴温搴‵发桦攔汶晢?厥挬椠攱渹挸攵?′ㄩ?????????????????ㄠ??扩爠?孥?ㄠ嵓??慮爠瑈極湩???????敡祷扡敲捤欠????偭略獮獴敳琠????唠牙慡湮楧畴浺?戠敒桩慶癥楲漠畡牮?椠湴?瑥栠敳?婵慲楣牥攠?敦猠瑤略慰牯祳孩?嵩??丠敳瑥桤敩牭汥慮湴摳猠??漠畴牨湥愠汎?潲晴?匠敂慲?剮散獨敛慊牝挮栠?????????????????????????打牣?孥??嵩??摣洠潒湥摳??????卉灮楳癴慩捴歵?????爹愸渵琨′???攭琱?愮氼???桛攲洲楝挠慓汨?搠祊渠慚洮椠捔獩?潡晬?瑲桥敳??桰慥湮杳橩楯慮渠条??猠瑴畲慡牮祳孰?嵲???潲湯瑣楥湳敳湥瑳愠汯?匠桦敩汮晥?剳敥獤敩慭牥据桴??????????????????????扥爠?孮??嵨??数牡杲煴畩楡獬瑬???????漠祃汨敡???????爠潒湩?楥獲漠瑥潳灴敵獡?楹測?瑃桨敩??洺慁稠潰湥?剳楯癮敡牬?獰祥獲瑳数浥?坴敩慶瑥桛敊牝椮渠杇?慯湭摯?瑰牨慯湬獯灧潹爬琠′猰椱朰測愠琱甲爱攨猳嬯?崩???愳爭琱栵?愮渼摢?倾汛愲渳敝琠慎牥祧?卥捬椠敐渮挠敍??整瑩琭敥牬獥???ぴ??????????㈠?????????扥牳?孵??嵹?即睥慤物穭敥湮獴歳椺?偮?坨???捯歧敥敮???????潡潴瑵桲??????啲牣慥湳楛畊浝?朠故潳捴桵敡浲楩獮瑥爬礠?潯湡?瑴桡敬??浮慤稠潓湨?卬桦攠汓晣??桮散浥椬挠愱氹?瀷栬愠猴攴?瀴愩爺琳椹琵椭漴渱椰渮朼?慲渾摛′挴祝挠汁楢湲杩?愠捇爬漠獅獴?慨?獢慥汲椠湈椬琠祄?杬物慬摬楥攠湂琬嬠?嵴???攮漠捃桡楲浢楯据慡?敥琠??潳獳浯潬捵桴楩浯楮挠慩??捴瑨慥???????????ㄠ????????扣爠?孯??嵥??湳摴敵牡獲獹潛湊?倮?卍??偩潮牥挠故汣汯楬?????畐獲瑯慧晲獥獳潳渠?佥??敥瑳?愠氲?‰吳栬攠′椵洹瀺漱爲琹愭渱挳攸?漼晢?挾潛氲氵潝椠摊獩?普潧爠?瑵桥敹?扮攬栠慙癵椠潚牨?潧晡?畧爬愠湋極甠浔?楌猬漠瑥潴瀠敡獬?椠湄?瑳桴敲?汢潵睴?獯慮氠楯湦椠瑵祲?穮潩湵敭?潩晳?慴?獰瑥慳戠汩敮?整獨瑥甠慭牡祩孮?嵣???敮潥捬栠楯浦椠捙慥?敬瑯??潒獩浶潥捲栠椨浈極捡慮??捥琩愬???どの???????????????al Shelf Research, 2009, 29(4):719-727.

Li Chen, Wu Menwu, Zhang Junyong. Effect of the three gorges project on sediment transportation of the Yangtze estuary[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2003, 12(1):50-54.

Lin S, Hsieh I J, Huang Kuoming, et al. Influence of the Yangtze River and grain si

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计