CMIP5气候模式下淡水通量变化

张守文; 王辉; 姜华; 杜凌

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2016.01.002

CMIP5气候模式下淡水通量变化

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2016.01.002

张守文¹,
王辉²,
姜华^2,,
杜凌³

1.
中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院, 山东青岛 266100;国家海洋环境预报中心, 北京 100081
2.
国家海洋环境预报中心, 北京 100081
3.
中国海洋大学海洋与大气学院, 山东青岛 266100

基金项目: 国家海洋局海洋公益性专项(201505013);国家自然科学基金(41376008,41106024,41376016)。

计量
- 文章访问数: 2193
- HTML全文浏览量: 12
- PDF下载量: 7496
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2014-12-19
- 修回日期: 2015-02-02

Freshwater flux variations based on CMIP5 climate models

1.
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, State Oceanic Administration, Beijing 100081, China
2.
National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, State Oceanic Administration, Beijing 100081, China
3.
College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

摘要

摘要: 基于全球降水气候态计划(GPCP)的降水资料和美国伍兹霍尔海洋研究所(WHOI)的客观分析海气通量(OAFlux)的蒸发数据,对CMIP5的13个耦合模式的淡水通量历史模拟结果进行评估。结果表明:模式能够模拟出淡水通量的气候态空间分布,但普遍存在双热带辐合带(ITCZ)现象,热带海域是模式模拟不确定性最大的区域。模式能较好模拟出纬向平均的淡水通量的分布特征,但量值较实测偏小,且由于模式对1月10°S附近淡水通量的模拟过低,导致年平均的赤道和10°S之间的淡水通量模拟存在明显的偏差。季节尺度上,模式对北半球淡水通量的变化特征有很好的模拟能力,但对南半球的模拟能力不足。年际尺度上,模式普遍能够刻画ENSO引起的淡水通量在太平洋中部同西太平洋以及印尼贯通流反相变化的空间分布特征,但是时间特征模拟很差。从各个方面评估模式的历史模拟结果,多模式集合的结果都要优于单个模式的结果。全球变暖背景下,未来淡水通量变化最显著的区域位于热带和亚热带区域。原本蒸发(降水)占主导的海域,蒸发(降水)更强。不同气候情景下,淡水通量变化的空间形态没有显著变化,但RCP8.5气候情景下模拟的淡水通量变化幅度及模式间变化的一致性均强于RCP4.5的结果。
- 淡水通量 /
- CMIP5 /
- 模式比较 /
- 预估 /
- 情景
Abstract: Reanalysis precipitation datasets from Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) and evaporation datasets from WHOI OAflux project are used to evaluate the historical freshwater flux from 13 CMIP5 climate models. The results show that all models could capture the climatological space distribution while the double ITCZs are widespread and the tropical ocean is the region with most significant uncertainties among the models. Latitudinal distributions of zonal-mean freshwater and their seasonal variations are broadly captured by most of the models. But the models' results are smaller than the reanalysis data,freshwater simulation between 10°S and the equator shows significant bias because of the overestimate of freshwater in the January. On the seasonal timescale,the models show good result in the North Hemisphere,but have some deficiencies in the South Hemisphere. On the interannual timescale,the models could provide a suitable simulation of freshwater space distribution induced by ENSO,but they are deficient in simulating the temporal characteristics. Results of multi-model ensemble are superior to single model in all respects of evaluation.Tropical and sub-tropical ocean will change significant under the circumstance of global warming,where used to be dry will be drier and wet will be wetter. Spatial distribution pattern will not change markedly under different scenarios,but the amplitudes of freshwater flux and the consistency among the models will strengthen under RCP8.5 compared with the RCP4.5.
- freshwater flux /
- CMIP5 /
- model evaluation /
- projection /
- scenarios

HTML全文

参考文献(24)

Huang B Y,Mehta V M,Schneider N. Oceanic response to idealized net atmospheric freshwater in the pacific at the decadal time scale[J]. J Phys Oceanogr,2005,35(12): 2467-2486.

Renold M,Raible C C,Yoshimori M,et al. Simulated resumption of the north Atlantic meridional overturning circulation-Slow basin-wide advection and abrupt local convection[J]. Quatern Sci Rev,2010,29(1/2): 101-112.

Zhang L P,Wu L X,Zhang J X. Coupled ocean-atmosphere responses to recent freshwater flux changes over the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension region[J]. J Climate,2011,24(5): 1507-1524.

Zhang R H,Zheng F,Zhu J S,et al. Modulation of El Niño-Southern Oscillation by freshwater flux and salinity variability in the tropical Pacific[J]. Adv Atmos Sci,2012,29(4): 647-660.

Huntington T G. Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: review and synthesis[J]. J Hydrol,2006,319(1/4): 83-95.

Oki T,Kanae S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources[J]. Science,2006,313(5790): 1068-1072.

IPCC. Summary for policymakers[C]// Solomon S,Qin D,Manning M,et al. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2007.

IPCC. Climate change 2013: The physical science basis[C]//Stocker T F,Qin D,Plattner G K,et al. Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2013: 1535.

Held I M,Soden B J. Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming[J]. J Climate,2006,19(21): 5686-5699.

Meehl G A,Stocker T F,Collins W D,et al. Global climate projections[C]//Solomon S,Qin D,Manning M,et al. Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2007: 747-845.

Chou C,Neelin J D,Chen C A,et al. Evaluating the "rich-get-richer" mechanism in tropical precipitation change under global warming[J]. J Climate,2009,22(8): 1982-2005.

Liu Z,Mehran A,Phillips T J,et al. Seasonal and regional biases in CMIP5 precipitation simulations[J]. Climate Res,2014,60(1): 35-50.

Sillmann J,Kharin V V,Zhang X,et al. Climate extremes indices in the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble: Part 1. Model evaluation in the present climate[J]. J Geophys Res Atmos,2013,118(4): 1716-1733.

Kumar S,Merwade V,Kinter Ⅲ J L,et al. Evaluation of temperature and precipitation trends and long-term persistence in CMIP5 twentieth-century climate simulations[J]. J Climate,2013,26(12): 4168-4185.

陈晓晨,徐影,许崇海,等. CMIP5全球气候模式对中国地区降水模拟能力的评估[J]. 气候变化研究进展,2014,10(3): 217-225. Chen Xiaochen,Xu Ying,Xu Chonghai,et al. Assessment of precipitation simulations in China by CMIP5 multi-models[J]. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis,2014,10(3): 217-225.

李振朝,韦志刚,吕世华,等. CMIP5部分模式气温和降水模拟结果在北半球及青藏高原的检验[J]. 高原气象,2013,32(4): 921-928. Li Zhenchao,Wei Zhigang,Lv Shihua,et al. Verifications of surface air temperature and precipitation from CMIP5 model in northern hemisphere and Qinghai-Xizang plateau[J]. Plateau Meteorology,2013,32(4): 921-928.

Adler R F,Huffman G J,Ghang A,et al. The version-2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979-present)[J]. J Hydrometeor,2003,4(6): 1147-1167.

Yu L S,Weller R A. Objectively analyzed air-sea heat fluxes for the global ice-free oceans (1981-2005)[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc,2007,88(4): 527-539.

Zheng F,Zhang R H. Effects of interannual salinity variability and freshwater flux forcing on the development of the 2007/08 La Niña event diagnosed from Argo and satellite data[J]. Dyn Atmos Ocn,2012,57: 45-57.

Taylor K E,Stouffer R J,Meehl G A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design[J]. Bull Amer Meteor Soc,2012,93(4): 485-498.

Mechoso C R,Robertson A W,Barth N,et al. The seasonal cycle over the tropical Pacific in coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models[J]. Mon Wea Rev,1995,123(9): 2825-2838.

Curtis S. The El Niño-southern oscillation and global precipitation[J]. Geography Compass,2008,2(3): 600-619.

Schanze J J,Schmitt R W,Yu L L. The global oceanic freshwater cycle: a state-of-the-art quantification[J]. J Mar Res,2010,68(3/4): 569-595.

Williams P D,Guilyardi E,Sutton R,et al. A new feedback on climate change from the hydrological cycle[J]. Geophys Res Lett,2007,34: L08706.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计