3种浮游生物网对强壮箭虫捕获效率的比较研究

于浩; 刘光兴; 陈洪举

doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.10.014

3种浮游生物网对强壮箭虫捕获效率的比较研究

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.10.014

1.
中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266100
2.
中国海洋大学环境科学与工程学院, 山东青岛 266100;中国海洋大学海洋环境与生态教育部重点实验室, 山东青岛 266100

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金重大国际(地区)合作研究项目(41210008);高校基本科研业务费专项课题(201262017)。

计量
- 文章访问数: 1003
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 1072
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2015-01-05

A comparison study of the capture efficiency for Sagitta crassa of three types of plankton nets

1.
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
2.
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecology, Ocean University of China, Ministry of Education, Qingdao 266100, China

摘要

摘要: 为了比较大型浮游生物网(网孔505 μm)、WP-2型浮游生物网(网孔200 μm)和小型浮游生物网(网孔77 μm)对强壮箭虫(Sagitta crassa)的捕获效率,利用2012年11月在渤海中部采集的浮游动物样品进行了分析。结果显示:小网的捕获效率最高,分别为大网的2.9倍、WP-2网的1.3倍;大网对体长9 mm以下个体有明显漏采,WP-2网对体长4 mm以下和部分4~5 mm个体有明显漏采,小网对体长9 mm以上个体的捕获效率略低于大网和WP-2网。不同网具的捕获效率与箭虫个体大小密切相关,个体越小,网具间捕获效率的差异越明显,随着体长增大,差异缩小。建议今后在强壮箭虫的繁殖季节采集小网样品,作为其他网具样品的必要补充,为毛颚动物的种群动力学研究提供更全面、准确的基础数据。
- 浮游生物网 /
- 捕获效率 /
- 强壮箭虫
Abstract: To compare the capture efficiency for Sagitta crassa(chaetognatha) of three types of plankton nets (505 μm meshed coarse net,200 μm meshed WP-2 net and 77 μm meshed fine net),zooplankton samples were collected in central Bohai Sea in November,2012. The fine net outperformed the other two nets,respectively capturing 1.3 and 2.9 times the abundance of the WP-2 net and the coarse net. The coarse net apparently under-sampled less than 9mm long individuals; the WP-2 net under-sampled less than 4 mm long and a fraction of 4-5 mm long individuals; while the fine net appeared to be slightly less efficient when capturing more than 9 mm long individuals. The capture efficiency was closely correlated to the body size of S. crassa: smaller body size caused greater differences in capture efficiency of the nets. As for more than 9mm long individuals,avoidance of S. crassa probably accounted for the slightly lower capture efficiency of the fine net. We recommend that the fine net be employed for sampling S. crassa during reproduction periods to provide supplementary results to other types of nets,thus more reliable data could be obtained for future research of population dynamics.
- plankton nets /
- capture efficiency /
- Sagitta crassa

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

Wiebe P H,Benfield M C. From the Hensen net toward four-dimensional biological oceanography[J]. Prog Oceanogr,2003,56(1): 7-136.

王荣,张鸿雁,王克,等. 小型桡足类在海洋生态系统中的功能作用[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2002,33(5): 453-460. Wang Rong,Zhang Hongyan,Wang Ke,et al. Function performed by small copepods in marine ecosystem[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica,2002,33(5): 453-460.

Nichols J H,Thompson A B. Mesh selection of copepodite and nauplius stages of four calanoid copepod species[J]. J Plankton Res,1991,13(3): 661-671.

Hopcroft R R,Roff J C,Lombard D. Production of tropical copepods in Kingston Harbour,Jamaica: the importance of small species[J]. Mar Biol,1998,130(4): 593-604.

Gallienne C P,Robins D B. Is Oithona the most important copepod in the worlds oceans？[J]. J Plankton Res,2001,23(12): 1421-1432.

Turner J T. The importance of small planktonic copepods and their roles in pelagic marine food webs[J]. Zoological Studies,2004,43(2): 255-266.

Hwang J S,Kumar R,Dahms H U,et al. Mesh size affects abundance estimates of Oithona spp. (Copepoda,Cyclopoida)[J]. Crustaceana,2007,80(7): 827-837.

Di Mauro R,Capitanio F,Vinas M D. Capture efficiency for small dominant mesozooplankters (Copepoda,Appendicularia) off Buenos Aires Province (34°S-41°S),Argentine Sea,using two plankton mesh sizes[J]. Braz J Oceanogr,2009,57(3): 205-214.

Pitois S G,Shaw M,Fox C J,et al. A new fine-mesh zooplankton time series from the Dove sampling station (North Sea)[J]. J Plankton Res,2009,31(3): 337-343.

Riccardi N. Selectivity of plankton nets over mesozooplankton taxa: implications for abundance,biomass and diversity estimation[J]. J Limnol,2010,69(2): 287-296.

Makabe R,Tanimura A,Fukuchi M. Comparison of mesh size effects on mesozooplankton collection efficiency in the Southern Ocean[J]. J Plankton Res,2012,34(5): 432-436.

Wu C J,Shin C M,Chiang K P. Does the mesh size of the plankton net affect the result of statistical analyses of the relationship between the copepod community and water masses？[J]. Crustaceana,2011,84(9): 1069-1083.

连喜平,谭烨辉,刘永宏,等. 两种浮游生物网对南海北部浮游动物捕获效率的比较[J]. 热带海洋学报,2013,32(3): 33-39. Lian Xiping,Tan Yehui,Liu Yonghong,et al. Comparison of capture efficiency for zooplankton in the northern South China Sea,using two plankton mesh sizes[J]. J Trop Oceanogr,2013,32(3): 33-39.

王荣,王克. 两种浮游生物网捕获性能的现场测试[J]. 水产学报,2003,27(S1): 98-102. Wang Rong,Wang Ke. Field test of capture capabilities of two plankton nets[J]. J Fish China,2003,27(S1): 98-102.

毕洪生,孙松,高尚武,等. 渤海浮游动物群落生态特点:Ⅲ.部分浮游动物数量分布和季节变动[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(4): 513-521. Bi Hongsheng,Sun Song,Gao Shangwu,et al. The characteristics of zooplankton community in the Bohai Sea:Ⅲ. The distribution of abundance and seasonal dynamics of major taxa except copepoda[J]. Acta Ecolog Sin,2001,21(4): 513-521.

霍元子,孙松,杨波. 南黄海强壮箭虫(Sagitta crassa)的生活史特征[J]. 海洋与湖沼,2010,41(2): 180-185. Huo Yuanzi,Sun Song,Yang Bo. Life cycle of the chaetognath Sagitta crassa in the Southern Yellow Sea,China[J]. Oceanologia et Limnologia Sinica,2010,41(2): 180-185.

Uye S. Length-weight relationships of important zooplankton from the Inland Sea of Japan[J]. J Oceanogr Soc Jpn,1982,38(3): 149-158.

Skjoldal H R,Wiebe P H,Postel L,et al. Intercomparison of zooplankton (net) sampling systems: results from the ICES/GLOBEC sea-going workshop[J]. Prog Oceanogr,2013,108: 1-42.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计