Study on removal of brown tide-Aureococcus anophagef ferens by modified clay
-
摘要: 褐潮是一种由微微型藻引发的藻华,已连续4年在渤海海域暴发,给当地带来巨大的经济损失。目前,在褐潮尚不能有效预防、预控情况下,如何控制和减少其对生态环境和沿海经济带来的危害,成为一个急需解决的问题。利用改性黏土消除藻华是一种快速有效、并得以多次现场成功应用的方法。考察比较了多种不同产地、不同类型的黏土及其改性后对褐潮生物种Aureococcus anophagef ferens(抑食金球藻)的去除效果,选取5种典型的黏土作为主要的实验材料,开展了不同条件下黏土及其改性后对A. anophagef ferens去除效率的影响研究。实验发现,因A. anophagef ferens个体微小、藻华时密度大,相同用量的黏土或改性黏土对其去除效率低于常见的硅藻、甲藻生物;不同类型黏土对其去除效率有影响,高岭土的去除效率高于蒙脱土;而黏土改性后对A. anophagef ferens的去除效率提高3倍以上。在此基础上,还考察分析了黏土粒径、分散介质等因素对A. anophagef ferens去除效率的影响,为进一步研发安全、高效的褐潮应急消除材料做了有益探索。
-
关键词:
- 改性黏土 /
- 褐潮 /
- Aureococcusanophagefferens /
- 去除效率
Abstract: Brown tide is a type of harmful algal bloom caused by picoplanktonic algae. It has occured continuously since 2009 and caused significant economic losses in the Bohai Sea. Controlling and reducing detrimental environmental and economic losses in affected ecosystems become an urgent problem in situations where accurate prevention and pre-control systems are not available. Mitigation of HABs by clays is an important and widely used control method. A variety of original clays and modified clays were tested on the brown tide species-Aureococcus anophagef ferens and five typical clays were chosen as the main experimental material. A series of experiments that employed original and modified clays to remove Aureococcus anophagef ferens were tested. The results showed that removal efficiency of Aureococcus blooms may be limited due to their small size and cellular density. The removal efficiency varied with the type of clay and kaolinite indicated better removal ability as compared to montmorillonite. After modification, all clay types showed significant improvement with more than three folds in removal rates. Additionally, application procedures that increase the concentration of original and modified clays, select the appropriate clay particle size and use fresh water as dispersion medium would achieve higher cell removal efficiency. Overall, our study laid a foundation for further research into the more efficient, environmentally removal materials and technologies that can be used as emergency control strategies for brown tide in coastal waters.-
Key words:
- modified clay /
- brown tide /
- Aureococcus anophagefferens /
- removal efficiency
-
Anderson D M, Cembella A D, Hallegraeff G M.Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management[J]. Annual Review of Marine Science, Carlson C A and Giovannoni S J, 2012, 4(4): 143-176. McGillicuddy D J, Townsend D W, He R,et al. Suppression of the 2010 Alexandrium fundyense bloom by changes in physical, biological, and chemical properties of the Gulf of Maine[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2011, 56(6): 2411-2426. Sieburth J M, Johnson P W, Hargraves P E. Ultrastructure and ecology of Aureococcus anophagefferens gen-et-sp-nov (Chrysophyceae)-the dominant picoplankter during a bloom in Narragansett Bay, Rhode-Island, summer 1985[J]. Journal of Phycology, 1988, 24(3): 416-425. Nuzzi R. The brown tide-an overview[R]//Brown Tide Summit. Ronkonkoma, New York, New York Sea Grant Publication No.NYSI-W-95-001,1995: 13-23. Cosper E M, Lee C, Carpenter E J. Novel "brown tide" blooms in Long Island embayments: A search for the causes[C]. In Toxic marine phytoplankton: Proc. 4th Int. Conf. Elsevier, 1990: 17-28. Nuzzi R, Waters R A. Long-term perspective on the dynamics of brown tide blooms in Long Island coastal bays[J]. Harmful Algae, 2004, 3: 279-293. Cosper E M, Dennison W C, Carpenter E J, et al. Recurrent and persistent brown tide blooms perturb coastal marine ecosystem[J]. Estuaries, 1987, 10: 284-290. Tracey G A. Feeding reduction, reproductive failure, and mortality in Mytilus edulis during the 1985 brown tide in Narragansett-Bay, Rhode-Island[J]. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 1988, 50: 73-81. Probyn T, Pitcher G, Pienaar R, et al. Brown tides and mariculture in Saldanha Bay, South Africa[J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2001, 42(5): 405-408. Bricelj V M, Macquarrie S P, Schaffner R A. Differential effects of Aureococcus anophagefferens isolates ‘brown tide' in unialgal and mixed suspensions on bivalve feeding[J]. Mar Biol, 2001, 139: 605-615. Phillips R C, Mcroy C P. Handbook of Seagrass Biology: An Ecosystem Perspective[M]. New York:Garland Press, 1980: 350. 国家海洋局. 中国海洋灾害公报[R],2010. Anderson D M. Turning back the harmful red tide -Commentary[J]. Nature, 1997, 388(6642): 513-514. Anderson D M, Andersen P, Bricelj V M, et al. Monitoring and management strategies for harmful algal blooms in coastal waters[C]. APEC 201-MR-01.1, Asia Pac. Econ. 2001. Program Singap. And Intergov. Oceanogr. Comm. Tech. Ser. 59, Paris. 俞志明,邹景忠,马锡年. 一种提高粘土矿物去除赤潮生物能力的新方法[J]. 海洋与湖沼,1994, 25(2):226-232. Pierce R H, Henry M S, Higham C J, et al. Removal of harmful algal cells (Karenia brevis) and toxins from seawater culture by clay flocculation[J]. Harmful Algae, 2004, 3(2): 141-148. Sengco M R, Hagstrom J A, Graneli E, et al. Removal of Prymnesium parvum (Haptophyceae) and its toxins using clay minerals[J]. Harmful Algae, 2005, 4(4): 801-801. Degens E T, Ittekot V. A new look at clay-organic interactions[J]. Mitt Geol Palaeont Inst Univ Hamburg, 1984, 56: 229-248. Shirota A. Red tide problem and countermeasures (2)[J]. Int J Aquat Fish Technol, 1989, 1:195-223. OMelia C R, Tiller C L. Physicochemical aggregation and deposition in aquatic environments[M]//Buffle J, Van Leeuwen H P. Environmental Particles. Lewis Publishers Inc., Boca Raton F L, 1993, 2: 353-386. Mccave I N. Size spectra and aggregation of suspended particles in the deep ocean[J]. Deep-Sea Res,1984, 31(4): 329-352. Han M,Kim W. A theoretical consideration of algae removal with clays[J]. Microchem J, 2001, 68: 157-161. 俞志明,邹景忠,马锡年. 一种去除赤潮生物更有效的粘土种类[J]. 自然灾害报,1994,3(2):105-109. Yu Zhiming, Zou Jingzhong, Ma Xinian. Application of clays to removal of red tide organisms: Ⅰ. Coagulation of red tide organisms with clays[J]. Chin J Oceanol Limnol, 1994, 12(3): 193-200. 齐雨藻,等. 中国沿海赤潮[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2003:104-249.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1288
- HTML全文浏览量: 9
- PDF下载量: 1227
- 被引次数: 0